[AZ-Observing] Re: HST/Shuttle Sighting Opportunities

  • From: <saguaroastro@xxxxxxx>
  • To: az-observing@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
  • Date: Tue, 12 May 2009 10:28:47 -0700

Made the cardinal sin of overquoting, so if you get this twice , apologies.

Rick
---- saguaroastro@xxxxxxx wrote: 
> Dick,
> 
> I'd imagine that that is correct. To get from the ISS to the HST would 
> require two really big burns. As Tom P pointed out the difference in orbital 
> inclination is 24 degrees. They first have to make  a plane change burn which 
> for that large an inclination difference would probably not be possible given 
> the amount of fuel on board the Shuttle. Then they have to make the transfer 
> burn, which also would be fuel intensive. 
> 
> It would be possible to combine the burn, but the geometry would have to be 
> perfect and most likley would not occur all that often. Essentially the burn 
> would need to occur at one of the orbital nodes and the target would need to 
> be in the proper position for rendevous at that specific moment. 
> 
> So it's gotta be one or the other. 
> 
> The 28 degree inclination of teh HST wasn't chosen just to make things 
> difficult. Gievn the higher orbit, launching due east from the Cape would use 
> the least amount of fuel to orbit and result in an inclination equal to the 
> lattitude of the launch site. The XM radio sats were launched from the middle 
> of the Pacific Ocean right on the Equator to take advantage of the earths 
> rotational speed and get them into the proper equatorial orbit.
> 
> If anyone wants to have a whack at playing with orital mechanics try the 
> freeware prgram "orbiter"; http://orbit.medphys.ucl.ac.uk/. It's a great 
> spaceflight simulator, although it does have a pretty high learning curve. 
> 
> Rick
> 
> 
> ---- Richard Harshaw <rharshaw2@xxxxxxx> wrote: 
> > Good question.  Last night on the Science Channel, they ran a 1-hour show on
> > the final repair mission and said that the shuttle cannot carry enough fuel
> > to dock with the ISS and still reach Hubble orbit, that they would have to
> > do a manual inspection for tile damage before flying up to Hubble's orbit.
> > Did I hear that right?

--
See message header for info on list archives or unsubscribing, and please 
send personal replies to the author, not the list.

Other related posts: