[AZ-Observing] Re: Duration of Mars Closest Approach

  • From: SaguaroAstro@xxxxxxx
  • To: az-observing@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
  • Date: Mon, 18 Aug 2003 19:02:15 EDT

Given the fact that it took me me two years of calculus to understand the 
concept and that I never did master the actual workings of it (although I 
passed 
due to the pity of my instructors), Here is a chart I created in Skymap with 
the Distance (in AU, I'll let yuo do the math :)) and Size, along with 
magnitude & phase (thought I'd throiw that in because I could).
Looks like ours Mars party on the 4th of Oct will still have the planet at 
90% of it's maximum size. 

Ephemeris of Mars

Date           Mag      Diam "     Distance      Phase  
19 Aug 2003    -2.8     24.80      0.3773612     0.993  
21 Aug 2003    -2.8     24.94      0.3753689     0.995  
23 Aug 2003    -2.8     25.03      0.3739249     0.996  
25 Aug 2003    -2.9     25.09      0.3730394     0.997  
27 Aug 2003    -2.9     25.11      0.3727202     0.998  
29 Aug 2003    -2.9     25.10      0.3729725     0.998  
31 Aug 2003    -2.9     25.04      0.3737977     0.998  
02 Sep 2003    -2.8     24.95      0.3751931     0.997  
04 Sep 2003    -2.8     24.82      0.3771529     0.996  
06 Sep 2003    -2.8     24.65      0.3796690     0.994  
08 Sep 2003    -2.7     24.46      0.3827321     0.992  
10 Sep 2003    -2.7     24.23      0.3863328     0.989  
12 Sep 2003    -2.6     23.97      0.3904612     0.986  
14 Sep 2003    -2.6     23.69      0.3951078     0.983  
16 Sep 2003    -2.5     23.38      0.4002623     0.980  
18 Sep 2003    -2.5     23.06      0.4059140     0.976  
20 Sep 2003    -2.4     22.72      0.4120516     0.972  
22 Sep 2003    -2.4     22.36      0.4186629     0.968  
24 Sep 2003    -2.3     21.99      0.4257349     0.964  
26 Sep 2003    -2.3     21.60      0.4332533     0.960  
28 Sep 2003    -2.2     21.21      0.4412023     0.955  
30 Sep 2003    -2.1     20.82      0.4495642     0.951  
02 Oct 2003    -2.1     20.42      0.4583209     0.947  
04 Oct 2003    -2.0     20.02      0.4674549     0.942  
06 Oct 2003    -1.9     19.62      0.4769504     0.938  
08 Oct 2003    -1.9     19.23      0.4867934     0.934  
10 Oct 2003    -1.8     18.83      0.4969715     0.930  
12 Oct 2003    -1.8     18.44      0.5074738     0.926  
14 Oct 2003    -1.7     18.06      0.5182906     0.922  
16 Oct 2003    -1.6     17.68      0.5294128     0.918  
18 Oct 2003    -1.6     17.31      0.5408319     0.915  
20 Oct 2003    -1.5     16.94      0.5525394     0.911  
22 Oct 2003    -1.5     16.58      0.5645271     0.908  
24 Oct 2003    -1.4     16.23      0.5767862     0.905  
26 Oct 2003    -1.3     15.88      0.5893068     0.902  
28 Oct 2003    -1.3     15.55      0.6020776     0.899  
30 Oct 2003    -1.2     15.22      0.6150872     0.896  
01 Nov 2003    -1.2     14.90      0.6283250     0.894  
03 Nov 2003    -1.1     14.58      0.6417821     0.891  
05 Nov 2003    -1.1     14.28      0.6554511     0.889  
07 Nov 2003    -1.0     13.98      0.6693262     0.887  
09 Nov 2003    -1.0     13.70      0.6834026     0.885  
11 Nov 2003    -0.9     13.42      0.6976759     0.883  
13 Nov 2003    -0.8     13.14      0.7121426     0.881  
15 Nov 2003    -0.8     12.88      0.7267991     0.880  
17 Nov 2003    -0.7     12.62      0.7416420     0.878  
19 Nov 2003    -0.7     12.37      0.7566675     0.877  
21 Nov 2003    -0.7     12.13      0.7718711     0.876  
23 Nov 2003    -0.6     11.89      0.7872470     0.875  
25 Nov 2003    -0.6     11.66      0.8027880     0.874  

Rick


In a message dated 8/18/2003 15:41:18 US Mountain Standard Time, 
polakis@xxxxxxx writes:


> I just pasted Peter's table into a spreadsheet, and the curve looks a bit 
> different than the sine wave that I had in my mind -- more sharply peaked.
> 
> http://www.psiaz.com/polakis/diameter.jpg
> 
> And for those on the list who enjoy calculus as a hobby, here's the rate 
> of change in angular diameter for the rest of the year.
> 
> http://www.psiaz.com/polakis/change.jpg
> 
> The plot is jagged due to round-off error: there are only two decimal 
> points in the table on the EVAC site.
> 
> Obviously, the angular size of Mars is not changing when it is at its 
> maximum on August 27.  Its size is declining most rapidly (0.2" per day) 
> in early October, about five weeks past opposition.  That's when we're 
> pulling away from it the most rapidly, and not coincidentally when 
> it's "stationary" at the end of the retrograde loop.
> 
> Tom (who really doesn't enjoy calculus as a hobby, honest)
> 
> 
> 


Rick Tejera
Editor SACnews
Saguaro Astronomy Club
Phoenix, Arizona
SaguaroAstro@xxxxxxx
www.saguaroastro.org


--
See message header for info on list archives or unsubscribing, and please 
send personal replies to the author, not the list.

Other related posts: