On Tom's note, I would rate this comet in the top 10 astronomical objects/event observed in my life. The comet is golden in appearance, structurally no different than a planetary nebula, similar to say NGC 6826 or perhaps the Eskimo. At 400 and 560x with a 10-inch, the coma's soft perimeter is a shell subtlety brighter than the interior, which has some faint mottling north of the nucleus. An outer halo-esque haze is vaguely apparent around the coma, but under the full moon and city glow, is marginally visible with do discernible structure. A "plume" of material is south and adjacent to the coma, half to 2/3rds the way to the perimeter shell. Seeing degrades at 560x, however I get the impression of a faint arc just north by a few arc seconds of the nucleus. Thank you to everyone who posted notice, especially Brian Skiff with his comment, "No, city lights + Full Moon are not a problem." I went outside and immediately noticed Perseus was not the same constellation. -FRANK On Oct 24, 2007, at 10:33 PM, Tom Polakis wrote: > Not much to add to the great descriptions on this list. I will say > that it is handling magnification quite well. At 350x, I still > don't see any size to the perfectly centered nucleus. I would > hesitate to use this color in astronomical descriptions, but I'm > seeing it as orange. > > Should we expect the diameter of the bright, circular shell to > increase in the coming days? > > There are only a handful of times in my astro observing career > where I knew right away that I was seeing something for the first > and last time. The most notable is still Jupiter after Comet S-L 9 > in 1994, but this one is right up there. > > Tom > -- > See message header for info on list archives or unsubscribing, and > please > send personal replies to the author, not the list. > -- See message header for info on list archives or unsubscribing, and please send personal replies to the author, not the list.