The chip in my camera is an interline NABG chip and it is my understanding that it is not designed to be used for science. Having said that, I ran a program called CCD sharp which allows you to analyze the 'stellar profile' of an object in the picture of your choosing. I did that with the comet on many of the frames and here is the result it gave me: Time Max pixel value 10:45 4365 10:47 5116 10:48 6157 10:49 6007 10:51 4623 10:52 4806 10:53 6780 10:55 7241 10:56 5435 10:57 5829 10:59 7224 11:00 8291 11:01 6580 11:05 8155 11:10 8144 11:16 7907 11:17 8796 11:18 11620 11:20 11083 11:21 10070 11:22 9258 11:24 11313 11:25 12314 11:26 12723 11:32 12175 11:37 9839 11:42 9197 11:48 10410 11:53 9325 11:58 7846 12:04 9215 I don't know how scientific this analysis is but the brightest pixels were limited to a very small area of the comet and I couldn't tell the difference visually from image to image. One last thing, note the sizes of the stars between the two frames of the Kitt peak animation. Not only does the comet nucleus get bigger, but the stars around it get bigger as well, which makes me a bit skeptical about whether the animation truly shows what was happening visually with the comet. Jon ----- Original Message ----- From: "Frank Kraljic" <FJKraljic@xxxxxxx> To: <az-observing@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> Sent: Monday, July 04, 2005 2:42 PM Subject: [AZ-Observing] Re: Comet Animation > > Jon, > > Here is a similar animation produced by Kitt Peak with a changing before > and > after animation. > > http://www.noao.edu/news/deep-impact/ > > Also, I wouldn't let the sky brightening get in the way of noting even a > marginal increase in brightness. As with Skiff's party, you even noted an > increase in peak-pixel count shortly after impact. Perhaps you could > coordinate your data with the visiting students at Lowell. > > -FRANK -- See message header for info on list archives or unsubscribing, and please send personal replies to the author, not the list.