Tom, not remembering all the details, my guess is that each image would not be a long integration hence should not take up large amounts of imaging time. Over the several months the imaging time would build up, besides the technology in the 8 short years since yours was taken has improved. Who knows what new may show up. BTW, I thought your aminated GIF was very neat and gave visible proof of goings on. Perhaps this could spark latent interests. Clear skies, aj ----- Original Message ----- From: "Tom Polakis" <tpolakis@xxxxxxx> To: <az-observing@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> Sent: Thursday, December 06, 2007 11:19 PM Subject: [AZ-Observing] Re: Colmet Holmes Tuesday night and changes in the Hubble Variable Nebula ---- AJ Crayon <acrayon@xxxxxxx> wrote: > Tom is my memory correct an if so are the images still available? Even though the pisaz.com server I was on died quite a while ago, the animated GIF is archived on the Wayback Machine. http://web.archive.org/web/20030217010150/www.psiaz.com/polakis/n2261/n2261_1999.html After I gave up CCD imaging, I urged other, much more capable imaging types to put together a better time-lapse movie, but there were no takers. Tom -- See message header for info on list archives or unsubscribing, and please send personal replies to the author, not the list. -- See message header for info on list archives or unsubscribing, and please send personal replies to the author, not the list.