Here are a brief sampling of some other objects that were taken from his suburban backyard (not Yosemite or Fremont Peak State Park): http://www.rdcrisp.darkhorizons.org/m31_the_andromeda_galaxy_page.htm http://www.rdcrisp.darkhorizons.org/ced214_emission_nebula_page.htm http://www.rdcrisp.darkhorizons.org/ic1795_fsq_emission.htm http://www.rdcrisp.darkhorizons.org/ic1795_ha_o3_page.htm http://www.rdcrisp.darkhorizons.org/ic1805_emission_nebula_page.htm http://www.rdcrisp.darkhorizons.org/ ic5068_emission_nebula_in_halpha_page.htm http://www.rdcrisp.darkhorizons.org/ic5070_pelican_nebula_color_page.htm http://www.rdcrisp.darkhorizons.org/ m17_swan_nebula_emission_line_page.htm Anyway, I found it amazing what technology and a lot of effort can produce from suburban skies. Greg Askins Chandler, AZ On Monday, September 8, 2003, at 10:50 AM, Brian Skiff wrote: >>> ...from his "backyard in the San Francisco Bay Area, which suffers >>> from >>> typical urban light pollution". >>> Pretty amazing images from a non-dark site. > > But in the material for the image itself at the photographer's > site, > it says the iamges were taken at a place near Yosemite (i.e. fairly > dark) > and at Fremont Peak State Park, which seems to be the Silicon Valley > equivalent of Vekol Road, medium-dark, specially if there's fog > covering > the urban areas. This is all narrow-band stuff (i.e. avoiding light- > pollution lines) on what is after all one of the highest > surface-brightness > nebulae in the sky. I would commend the guy not for getting something > like this from less-than-perfect sites, but the large amount of time > both exposing and processing the data. See details here: > > http://www.rdcrisp.darkhorizons.org/ > m8_hourglass_region_emission_page.htm > > \Brian > -- > See message header for info on list archives or unsubscribing, and > please > send personal replies to the author, not the list. > -- See message header for info on list archives or unsubscribing, and please send personal replies to the author, not the list.