[AZ-Observing] Re: Blue Moon is Wrong
- From: Jeff Hopkins <phxjeff@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- To: az-observing@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Date: Thu, 31 May 2007 09:00:23 -0700
Hello Stan,
I find it amusing that the term "Blue Moon" causes so much concern.
I don't know who has the final say on what it means. I do know it is
an indication of something rare. The idea that it's two full moons in
a given month is certainly easy to understand. Other meanings are
more complex and I fail to see the value of arguing over it. I'm
happy with just thinking of it as two full moons in a given month.
As for the contrails I suspect it was just that the atmospheric
condition were right to produce them. I have seen that happen over
Phoenix too.
Jeff
At 08:32 -0700 05/31/2007, Stan Gorodenski wrote:
>I listened to NPR yesterday afternoon. They interviewed Kelly Beatty,
>executive editor of S&T, about the use of the term blue moon when a full
>moon occurs twice in a month. He said that term was in error and it was
>an error they started in an article in 1947. An amateur had done some
>research on the use of the term blue moon but was not that thorough. The
>term Blue Moon generally means a rare event, but it does not mean two
>full moons in a month.
>
>As an aside, gad were there a lot of jet trails over my place last
>night. Does anyone know if there was something going on or were the
>atmospheric conditions just right?
>Stan
--
Jeff Hopkins
HPO SOFT
Counting Photons
http://www.hposoft.com/Astro/astro.html
Hopkins Phoenix Observatory
7812 West Clayton Drive
Phoenix, Arizona 85033-2439 U.S.A.
(623)849-5889
(623) 247-1190 (Fax)
www.hposoft.com
--
See message header for info on list archives or unsubscribing, and please
send personal replies to the author, not the list.
Other related posts:
