Joe, You raise some important points of discussion, no doubt. I think we need to read Dr. Berentine's AAS paper before drawing any further conclusions, and also perhaps visit the petroglyph site(s) to see for ourselves. Of course I am inclined to believe in the >possibility< of such an interpretation, but I agree with your insistence on proceeding with caution. Ultimately, it may never be possible to "prove" scientifically such an assertion. There are additional photographs of the White Tanks petroglyphs reproduced in a web article from the New Scientist magazine: http://www.newscientistspace.com/article/dn9273-native-americans-recorded-supernova-explosion.html Unfortunately, all of the news releases about Dr. Berentine's paper that are available on the internet merely regurgitate the same story, without adding any more information. Since the AAS meeting just occurred, I don't believe Berentine's full paper is available yet. Dr. Gene Krupp of Griffith Observatory (a respected authority an archeoastronomy) made much the same points with Jim Vail and myself, regarding our photos and sketches of a petroglyph site in central Arizona, which we believe >may< represent the Crab Nebula SNe. (See George DeLange's web pages for photos and more information on the "Big Deer" site petroglyphs): Gene Lucas (17250) Joe Orman wrote: >Excuse me for being Mr. Skeptical, but the evidence (at least as presented in >the Arizona Republic article) that this petroglyph represents a supernova is >not convincing and doesn't warrant such wide publicity. I've studied and >written about rock art and archaeoastronomy, and one point I always try to >make is that we shouldn't assume ancient people saw things the way our modern >culture does ... and context is everything. > [other importatnt points snipped, to avoid being net-nannied! -- GAL] -- See message header for info on list archives or unsubscribing, and please send personal replies to the author, not the list.