atw: Re: Youse
- From: "bja" <moo-man@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- To: <austechwriter@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Wed, 11 Jan 2012 18:14:51 +1100
And here I am still waiting for 'farq' to be added as a derivation to get
around abuse filters.
:)
One can only hope.
Cheers,
Bruce
_____
From: austechwriter-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
[mailto:austechwriter-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Kath Bowman
Sent: Wednesday, 11 January 2012 2:19 PM
To: austechwriter@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: atw: Re: Youse
You can invent a word, but you can't get it into a dictionary! I have been
trying to get 'engageable' into the Macquarie for a few years, without
success.
Engageable - able to be engaged (in the military sense).
Cheers
Kath
From: austechwriter-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
[mailto:austechwriter-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Michael Lewis
Sent: Wednesday, 11 January 2012 12:01 PM
To: austechwriter@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: atw: Re: Youse
Yebbut . . . The "nitwits" own the language along with everyone else; you
don't need a licence to invent a new word!
- Michael Lewis
On 11 January 2012 12:27, Rebecca Caldwell <beckyakasha@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
Fine! Badly worded on my part ;)
I do not accept 'youse' as a word by any means, but meant that it was a
'real' word, and not just the incomprehensible pronounciation of a nitwit.
_____
No virus found in this message.
Checked by AVG - www.avg.com
Version: 10.0.1416 / Virus Database: 2109/4135 - Release Date: 01/10/12
Other related posts:
