atw: Re: Statistics to demonstrate value ...

  • From: Peter Martin <peterm_5@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
  • To: <austechwriter@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>, <austechwriter@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
  • Date: Mon, 19 Oct 2009 16:27:12 +1100

Janice Gelb:
You wrote:
> On 19/10/09 02:57 PM, Peter Martin wrote:
>
>> Just another thought or two -- along these lines (But beware! this may be a 
>> two-edged
>> sword if your templates don't comply with recommendations)
>>
>> From time to time it is convenient to point out that badly-formatted 
>> documents bugger
>> customer comprehension.
>>
> [snip]
>> Meanwhile, (or in addition), often Support people can provide assistance 
>> here if they
>> can point to instances where sloppy docs gave them more grief than they 
>> needed, which
>> ruins the company's product image, wastes support time, and pisses customers 
>> off.
>> (One reason why I'm a great believer in tech writers doing what they can to 
>> co-
>> ordinate with Support people, have them reviewing docs, and listening to 
>> what help
>> desk people say about what customers just get wrong or simply don't read in 
>> the docs.)
>>
>
> All good points. However, they relate to product docs and external customers. 
> Because
> the original post specifically noted that these were in-house documents, I 
> didn't
> include these angles.
>

Just clarifying that...... Looking back at Suzy's posts, I see she has been 
referring to Functional Specs etc and a few other documents which one assumes 
from the "Sales" context may be part of the contracting process with a customer 
on a sales proposal etc.

Which only goes to emphasize what I was trying to say:

Documents like these need to be reviewed and understood thoroughly by all the 
parties involved (QA principles would certainly indicate that).

What you have with an unclear and badly-formatted Functional Spec document 
presented to a customer is potential for disaster in several key areas:

a.) the sales people misunderstand the specs
b.) the customers misunderstand the specs;
c.) the developers misunderstand the specs;
d.) the testers misunderstand the specs and the test requirements etc etc. 
etc...

Any of which can cost +millions+ in some companies....   And I've seen it 
happen just that way.

Suzy, tell 'em your part of their business insurance and worth the millions 
they might otherwise lose....




-PeterM
peterm_5@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Fear is the mind killer. - Paul Muad'Ib
**************************************************
To view the austechwriter archives, go to 
www.freelists.org/archives/austechwriter

To unsubscribe, send a message to austechwriter-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx with 
"unsubscribe" in the Subject field (without quotes).

To manage your subscription (e.g., set and unset DIGEST and VACATION modes) go 
to www.freelists.org/list/austechwriter

To contact the list administrator, send a message to 
austechwriter-admins@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
**************************************************

Other related posts: