Yes it is, because I think the adviser has figured out that Amanda was getting the shaft. What’s so interesting though is, that what goes around does come back around again. I don’t know when it will happen, but it will. > On Mar 23, 2015, at 7:48 PM, Josh <lawdog911@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > I misspoke when I said she was putting in frist name and then last because > although she did this, she did not do it on formal paperwork. The only thing > she put names down like this on was on the legal pad. However, she handed her > the documentation today. The lady refused to comment on the fact that Amanda > points out in the documentation that one girl worked on one file for 2 solid > weeks when they are telling Amanda to have 5 or more done in a day. She > refused to comment on the shoddy training. She refused to comment on the > verbal agreement to sign off on the internship. She only told Amanda thank > you, but this does not make it acceptable. She starts at her original > internship tomorrow. The advisor is going to let her count the time worked at > the law office as filler time for what she does not make up at the original > internship. So, this is definitely answered prayers. > > From: audio-pals-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx > <mailto:audio-pals-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> > [mailto:audio-pals-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx > <mailto:audio-pals-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>] On Behalf Of Thomas McMahan > Sent: Monday, March 23, 2015 10:40 AM > To: audio-pals@xxxxxxxxxxxxx <mailto:audio-pals@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> > Subject: [audio-pals] Re: Horrible News > > Yes but their deal of her staying there till she finds other employment > sounds like, “we don’t want you, yet in reality we really don’t have that > much on you to get rid of you uf chalenged by a State labor board.” > > Hight standards are one thing, but if you aren’t given procedural information > in training and then that is used against you that gives her something to > stand on. However, in reality, most things do go by last name first, it’s > more the rare exception that a list is organized using the first name first. > But that is something simple and petty. I think maybe she’s offended the > powers that be by her own standards of what she does and probably caught > someone higher up in their mistakes along the way and now they get revenge. > If that is the case they’d better cover their trail good. >> On Mar 21, 2015, at 1:14 PM, Josh <lawdog911@xxxxxxxxxxx >> <mailto:lawdog911@xxxxxxxxxxx>> wrote: >> >> She has put in 4 applications last night. We are hoping and praying for >> positive results. I agree that Amanda may have made some mistakes, but I >> think more so they are unable to stand good on the fact that they would sign >> off on her internship. So, when they have an opportunity to dismiss her they >> take the opportunity. One of the grounds for Amanda accepting the position >> was that they would sign off on her internship. The employer said they have >> never done this, but if it is allowed they would do it. The employer failed >> to realize that this means Amanda will need to be doing certain tasks >> related to her degree. So, why not take the quickest and easiest way out of >> the situation. I still think that based on her recent diagnosis she should >> disclose if for no other reason to point out to the employer that it may not >> have been her fault the mistakes that were made. According to things I am >> reading even if they continue with the course of action that they are taking >> they cannot refuse to talk to her about the disability and possible >> solutions that do not cause undue hardship. I did not realize until doing >> some research that this was even a condition covered under the ADA, but when >> looking at my school’s website it says that one of the things that they >> cover on the disability website was ADHD. Being that they offer services I >> started doing some research and low and behold it is covered. So, we will >> see what happens. I imagine that they will continue the process and htat is >> ok because we can compensate even if they tell her to take a hike on Monday >> morning without even getting into the house money set aside. If anything the >> house money will pay for her benefits. One of the reasons they said that she >> needed to look for another job is because during her 3 days of training when >> she started she was not told that names needed to be listed last name and >> then first. So, she has been putting names in first and then last. To me >> this sounds petty, but I told Amanda she should be careful when she started >> because of some of the things she would come home and tell me sounded like a >> person with unrelenting standards. Oh well, when one door closes another one >> opens. However, please keep us in your prayers during this transition. >> >> From: audio-pals-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx >> <mailto:audio-pals-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> >> [mailto:audio-pals-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx >> <mailto:audio-pals-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>] On Behalf Of Thomas McMahan >> Sent: Saturday, March 21, 2015 8:47 AM >> To: audio-pals@xxxxxxxxxxxxx <mailto:audio-pals@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> >> Subject: [audio-pals] Re: Horrible News >> >> Well glad you hadn’t jumped right in to one then. >> >> Hopefully it won’t take long before she can find herself another and better >> job. >> >>> On Mar 21, 2015, at 12:41 AM, Josh <lawdog911@xxxxxxxxxxx >>> <mailto:lawdog911@xxxxxxxxxxx>> wrote: >>> >>> We Will not be buying a house anytime soon so it seems. Today the bottom >>> dropped right out from under us with the news that Amanda would be losing >>> her job. Please keep us in your prayers. Talk to you later.