Dear All, My name is Grigori I'm sincerely wish to help some people to acquire more information and manipulate by info similar way like sighted people. However, ASVS does not mean a “poor” sonification “for sonification itself” for graphics or full images, like scientific research or case study to gather data and write the report or to test a new sound mapping only. I doubt that somebody of you got a full education in physiology, particularly in physiology of perception like me. This is my basic education. And, I can say definitely that physiology still is not the complete subject. There are a lot of speculations around artifacts than valid or/and validated data. But due to my own and long experience I can also see that some approaches in our area of the sonification were based on a wrong concept. And my own mappings were not so well. The start point is very important for the research when the goal of that is a practical outcome for the user. Will is quite write when he stated that “the software fit to the user, not the user fit to the software”!!! Recently, I’ve given a presentation on similar subject. Sorry, for some of you it could be problematic for interpretation as ppt is mostly oriented on graphics and my comments. But I’ll give you the link and will comment later some questions if necessary. ~ 1.6 Mb http://www.cs.uta.fi/~grse/ConferenceWork/UCIT_seminar/SensesAndAccessibility.ppt If you could apply Artificial instead of auditory in abbreviation ASVS it could be more suitable later as the sound in this case is only the case study but in the final system, other signals could be used as well. For instance, any other skin irritation like as mechanical stimulation through vibrations (not sound) or electrical current or whatever. In such a case, the problem of information occlusion (other speech and auditory info) could be resolved. This is also important factor for the blind, as using the AuditorySVS the visually impaired people will lose the “hearing” (not like perception ability). Grigori