Hi Brian, Great point. Thanks so much. Every person on this list is concerned with client safety. I think it is important to be able to talk about the pros and cons of any topic in order to raise awareness and ultimately improve safety for our clients. Sometimes in the discussions various points might on the surface look like safety was not a priority but when we look at all of it together.... safety is helped. john. BMclane <BMclane@paradigm solutionsllc.net> To Sent by: "associates@xxxxxxxxxxxxx" associates-bounce <associates@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> @freelists.org cc Mark N Glauser <mglauser@xxxxxxx> Subject 05/04/2009 09:36 [associates] Re: Back up steering AM systems Please respond to associates@freeli sts.org Anyone interested in consumer safety! Brian P. McLane Paradigm Solutions, LLC. Governor's Square 29 Rockefeller Blvd. Rensselaer, NY12144 (518)426-8850 "A Strategic Allicance Company" From: associates-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:associates-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Jacques Bolduc Sent: Friday, May 01, 2009 10:01 AM To: associates@xxxxxxxxxxxxx Subject: [associates] Re: Back up steering systems This type of problem is typical in an aftermarket modification that taps into someone else’s system. There does exist a steering system (and backup system) test that has never been used by any reduced effort steering manufacturer (SAE J2672). To my knowledge, the State of Ohiois requiring that reduced effort steering systems meet this SAE test as of August 1 2009. There are a couple of glitches with Ohio’s requirement – first, the cost of the test is not justified considering the business opportunity for the manufacturer. Second, the test has never been undertaken and nobody knows if it is realistic, feasible or adequate to demonstrate the reliability and safety of the reduced effort steering. Lastly, the test centers are not equipped to conduct the test and the first company to test will bear the brunt of setup costs. I do not know of a supplier of reduced effort steering systems that can afford to test unless all manufacturers test and the cost of these systems is adjusted in relation to the expense – but who wants to talk about increasing prices, or policing who has tested and who is simply stating that they have tested? Not much help, I’m sorry. Some options may include NMEDA requiring that these systems meet more specific requirements, that States require some kind of demonstration of reliability, etc. Jacques Bolduc, SRD Bolduc - Tampa cel 813-410-4884 From: associates-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:associates-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of John Anschutz Sent: Thursday, April 30, 2009 9:07 PM To: associates@xxxxxxxxxxxxx Subject: [associates] Re: Back up steering systems What a great topic. I am not sure I know the answer. I sometimes wonder if the backup pump is a backup for a problem that could be prevented. I have a van with zero effort steering. It suffers from stress due to over-heating of the steering fluid. I think the original problem stemmed from two sources. 1. If the engine is running and the Van is parked or at idle for an extended time with the wheels turned it will overheat the steering fluid. 2. Sometimes with new drivers or in an eval our evaluators want to really check out the client's turning abilities before ever going on the road. Let me tell you that the rate of change in wheel direction with a Zero Effort (sorry I am old school - Maximum reduced effort) steering is far greater than what is typical in traditional steering. It really heats up the oil. Overheats. The problem is that if the oil gets too hot seals can fail and you can have a lot of damage and you may have need for a back up system. Would a more modern approach be something like installing a steering fluid cooler like they do in some dirt track racing cars where they put great demands on steering? I think DSI uses a cooler in their system. Also, if we had a temperature monitor on the fluid then a dangerous or damaging situation could most likely be avoided all together. If you can really do that then would you still need a backup pump? Seems like the consumer would appreciate the ability to avoid major repair. This is kind of like seeing that your car is overheating and you stop before you ruin the engine. In this case the complicating factor is that steering is so much more important for safety to the consumer. It would be nice if the consumer can avoid a problem and a failure of any kind. Once you have a need for the backup you are back to oil squirting somewhere and you could have a fire situation that you mentioned. Thanks again & I look forward to seeing other thoughts. John Anschutz Please don't anyone change there practices based on our discussion. We are just brainstorming. Please don't go out and change your practices based on these comments. On Apr 30, 2009, at 6:51 PM, cbckj@xxxxxxx wrote: Thanks for a forum to discuss our issues. It is really appreciated. I am an inspector and have the unique opportunity to poke my head into, and around a lot of converted vehicles. I am hoping to solicit opinions and guidance from this learned group of professionals, and to have some input into the general NMEDA community. Please understand, I just want to stimulate some dialogue, not propose policy...case in point: During inspections I have found that back up steering pumps are mounted in areas that are subject to damage even from minor impacts. My concern is that these systems could rupture and leak with high pressure flammable fluids spraying into the engine compartment. The pumps are frequently mounted in the front bumper. Back up steering systems have not changed in basic design for over 25 years. One of my discussion points, (besides location change and design) is the actual need for these systems. I have seen more problems with back up steering systems than I have heard reports that they serve their intended purpose. The maintenance and installation issues are numerous. Is the intended safety of this device worth the problems? I'm looking forward to your comments. C. Kerry Jones "The Space Between" cbckj@xxxxxxx The documents accompanying this transmission contain confidential information belonging to the sender that is legally privileged. This information is intended only for the use of the individuals or entity named above. The authorized recipient of this information is prohibited from disclosing the information to any other party and is required to destroy the information after its stated need has been fulfilled. If you are not the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any disclosure, copying, distribution or the taking of any action in reliance on the contents of this information is prohibited. If you have received this in error, please notify the sender immediately at the address above to arrange for the return of the original documents. Thank you Can't afford a new spring wardrobe? Go shopping in your closet instead! ForwardSourceID:NT0007AB4E