You are invited to an ASCCT member webinar: Incorporating New Technologies into Toxicity Testing and Risk Assessment: Moving from 21st Century Vision to a Data-Driven Framework Russell S. Thomas, The Hamner Institutes for Health Sciences See below for a description of the presentation. ----------------------------------------- Meeting Subject: Member webinar: Using new technologies for risk assessment Meeting Date: Thu Aug 16 2012 Meeting Time: 02:00:00 PM (GMT-05:00) US/Eastern ----------------------------------------- To join the meeting from your computer or mobile device, click or copy and paste this URL into your browser: https://www.fuzemeeting.com/fuze/e7071e9b/17106082 To join the audio portion of this meeting, choose your dial in method: Toll and international dial in: +1 (775) 996-3560 Toll free: +1 (800) 741-4032 Skype in by dialing contact: fuzemeeting When prompted enter the room number: Room #: 607845 ___________________________________________________________________________________________________________ Incorporating New Technologies into Toxicity Testing and Risk Assessment: Moving from 21st Century Vision to a Data-Driven Framework Russell S. Thomas, The Hamner Institutes for Health Sciences The release of the National Research Council’s Report “Toxicity Testing in the 21st Century: A Vision and a Strategy” in 2007 initiated a broad-based movement in the toxicology community to re-think how toxicity testing and risk assessment are performed. Since the release of the report, efforts such as the Human Toxicology Project, Risk21, and others have added to the momentum, but the majority of these efforts have focused more on a vision of how things should be done rather than the development of a data-driven paradigm. The focus on vision has been due to a lack of adequate datasets that would be required to develop a data-driven paradigm. This lack of data is gradually changing with the release of the ToxCast Phase I data, the development of high-throughput dosimetry approaches, and the collection of short-term in vivo transcriptomic studies. This webinar will briefly cover a series of studies that together inform what could be seen as a basis for a new data-driven paradigm to toxicity testing and risk assessment. The first study is a comprehensive cross-validation model comparison to evaluate the predictive performance of the more than 600 in vitro assays from the ToxCast Phase I screening effort across 60 in vivo endpoints using 84 different statistical classification methods. The predictive performance of the in vitro assays was compared to that of chemical structure descriptors. The results showed that the current suite of ToxCast high-throughput toxicity assays have limited applicability for predicting in vivo chemical hazards using standard statistical classification methods. However, if viewed as a survey of potential molecular initiating events and interpreted as risk factors for toxicity, the assays may still be useful for chemical prioritization. The second study involves the development of high-throughput methods for estimating pharmacokinetics for in vitro studies. Hepatic metabolic clearance and plasma protein binding were experimentally measured for a subset of the ToxCast Phase I chemicals using rat hepatocytes and plasma. Computational pharmacokinetic models used these results to estimate the rat daily oral dose necessary to produce steady-state in vivo blood concentrations equivalent to the AC50 values obtained in the 600 in vitro ToxCast assays. The estimated rat daily oral doses associated with the in vitro assays were compared to the low effect levels (LEL) for apical responses obtained from in vivo rodent studies. The results showed that the daily oral dose equivalent for the most sensitive in vitro assay provided a conservative estimate of the in vivo LEL value. The third study involves short-term in vivo transcriptomic measurements that were performed in dose-response and a multiple time points. When transcriptomic changes were grouped by pathway, the transcriptional dose-response changes were strongly correlated with both noncancer- and cancer-related apical endpoints and the correlations appeared stable over time and target tissue. In addition, transcriptional points-of-departure for the most sensitive pathway differed by less than an order of magnitude from the points-of-departure based on traditional apical endpoints. Together the three studies argue for a new tiered toxicity testing framework that is not based on the traditional model of hazard identification in animals. Rather, the new paradigm identifies a region of the dose-response curve where no significant biological perturbations are expected. A comparison of the region of safety with human exposure estimates provides a means to eliminate chemicals from further testing or transition chemicals to higher tiers while at the same time providing points-of-departure for risk assessment. ___________________________________________________________________________________________________________ Having trouble joining this meeting? Click or copy and paste this URL into your browser to visit the FUZE Support page: http://www.fuzemeeting.com/fuzemeeting/support Thanks for using Fuze Meeting. Kristie Sullivan, MPH Secretary American Society for Cellular and Computational Toxicology www.ascctox.org