In message <50b9bd099aevan@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> Evan Clark <evan@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > In article <2128b6b950.martin@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, > Martin Wuerthner <lists@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: >> Are the fonts that are not activated those used in text areas (as >> opposed to text lines)? If so, then your ArtWorks scanning >> extension in FontDirPro is too old. I once produced an updated >> utility that coped with text areas as well when FontDirPro was >> 32-bitted, but I never saw the final release version, so I am not >> sure whether it was actually released. > I suspect it wasn't released. I have the latest version of > FontDirPro, 3.11ß (05-Nov-03), and it fails to activate fonts in text > areas. >> What version of FontDirPro do you use and what is the size and date >> of your copy of !FontFS.FontFS.DocScan.Extensions.ArtWorks? > The size and date of the utility is the same in the beta version and > the 3.10 release version, namely 1128 bytes, 14:28:48 20 Jun 2003. Yes, that is the old version. I have just uploaded the improved version to: http://www.mw-software.com/software/awmodules/resources.html Martin -- --------------------------------------------------------------------- Martin Wuerthner MW Software lists@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx --------------------------------------------------------------------- ------------------------------------------------------------ To change, suspend or cancel your subscription go to //www.freelists.org/list/artworks ------------------------------------------------------------