Re: [artworks] What's in a name?

  • From: Martin Wuerthner <lists@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
  • To: artworks@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
  • Date: Mon, 08 May 2006 17:12:42 +0200

In message <684a6c224e.tony.still@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
          Tony Still <tony.still@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> [...]
> Sorry, just read this blizzard of E-mails! I think simpler than
> integral or integrated would be internal (and hence external). Same
> meaning, simpler and less intimidating word (with same or fewer
> letters).

Wow, late entry, but in my view, it has overtaken the rest. "internal" 
really makes a lot of sense - in particular, its opposite "external" 
makes a lot of sense, too. Many thanks, I think I will go with that.

Martin Wuerthner           MW Software          lists@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx

Other related posts: