Re: [artworks] What's in a name?

  • From: Richard Underwood <Artworks@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
  • To: artworks@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
  • Date: Thu, 04 May 2006 17:58:50 +0100

On 04 May, Martin Wuerthner <lists@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

> "Integral" is a great idea - very much to the point and probably 
> easier to understand than "coincident". 

For what its worth, I'm not so sure that it is easier to understand
because an integral arrowhead potentialy sounds like a particular type of
arrowhead (mathematical?) rather than the behaviour of the arrowheads.

Cheers,
Richard Underwood


Other related posts: