Re: [artworks] What's in a name?

  • From: Roel Wagenaar <roel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
  • To: artworks@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
  • Date: Thu, 04 May 2006 15:06:22 +0200

In message <861bbe214e.martin@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
          Martin Wuerthner <lists@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

> In message <4459F5DA.5010002@xxxxxxxx>
>           Clive Bonsall <C.Bonsall@xxxxxxxx> wrote:
> 
> > Christopher Rayson wrote:
> >> On Thu, 4 May 2006, Martin Wuerthner wrote:
> >> 
> >> 
> >>>So, the feature would be called "Subsumed arrows"? I think I still have
> >>>a slight preference for "Coincident arrows". Any other opinions?
> >> 
> >> 
> >> I'd refer to the current style for arrows as "Extended heads". I'm not
> >> sure what the opposite to that would be, though. "Contracted"? > Chris
> > 
> > Not bad ... I would suggest:
> > 
> > "Integral" (i.e. part of the line) for the new style
> > "Extended" for the current style
> 
> "Integral" is a great idea - very much to the point and probably 
> easier to understand than "coincident". Certainly my new favourite, 
> thanks Clive. We do not really need a name for the old style since I 
> want to do it as an option button, but it is good to have "extended" 
> in case it is needed.
> 
> Could anyone give me a Dutch expression for "integral"?
> 
> Martin

Integraal ??

-- 
Roel Wagenaar.
E-mail: roel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Thuis-pagina: http://www.familie-wagenaar.net

It is easier to fight for one's principles then to live up to them.

Other related posts: