Re: [artworks] What's in a name?

  • From: Clive Bonsall <C.Bonsall@xxxxxxxx>
  • To: artworks@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
  • Date: Thu, 04 May 2006 13:38:50 +0100

Christopher Rayson wrote:

On Thu, 4 May 2006, Martin Wuerthner wrote:


So, the feature would be called "Subsumed arrows"? I think I still have
a slight preference for "Coincident arrows". Any other opinions?


I'd refer to the current style for arrows as "Extended heads". I'm not
sure what the opposite to that would be, though. "Contracted"? > Chris

Not bad ... I would suggest:

"Integral" (i.e. part of the line) for the new style
"Extended" for the current style
--
Clive Bonsall
C.Bonsall@xxxxxxxx

Other related posts: