Re: [artworks] New arrowheads

  • From: DitUnDat@xxxxxxxxx
  • To: artworks@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
  • Date: Fri, 05 May 2006 18:12:03 +0200

In message <1d594b224e.martin@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
          Martin Wuerthner <lists@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

> In message <86ae48224e.HzN@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
>           DitUnDat@xxxxxxxxx wrote:
> 
> >> With both the filled and unfilled circles, there remains one question,
> >> however: Where exactly should they be positioned with respect to the
> >> line anchor point? [...]
> > 
> > Well, I think you might want to make it flexible, that is allow for
> > these anchor points to be considered the arrowhead:
> > 
> > 1. the tip is the outside of the circle on the opposite side of the
> >    arrows line so that you can position it so that the circle touches
> >    e.g. some rectangle
> > 
> > 2. the tip is the centre of the circle
> > 
> > Perhaps easiest is to define the circle arrowhead twice with one of the
> > two behaving as 1. and the other as 2.
> 
> Even better, the way I have defined them now makes them behave as 
> described in 2. with "Integrated" off and as described in 1. with 
> "Integrated" on, so a single arrow definition is enough.

Knowing your perfection I thus assume that the option "integrated" is
not a global one but one per arrow!

-- 
Herbert

Herbert zur Nedden
German Archimedes Group http://www.gag.de

Herausgeber DER deutschen RISC OS-Zeitschrift.

Other related posts: