In article <3b275b8150.martin@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, Martin Wuerthner <lists@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > In message <5080789e92riscos@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> Richard Ashbery > <riscos@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > Importing a pdf into pdf, V 3.00.1.19 renders the graphic > > at....... > > http://homepages.nildram.co.uk/~riscos/downloads/artworks/girl.zip > > correctly > Not at all. Compare it with what Adobe Reader displays. The > rendering in !PDF is pretty poor. It does not do any of the > graduated fills. I've just had another look at the PDF under Adobe and it is considerably better showing all the shading accurately rendered. A big difference indeed. > > but when importing into AW 2.82 the girl is "stripped" of some of > > her assets - poor lass. Can anyone tell me why? > > In case someone asks - the pdf was originally an Adobe > > Illustrator (ai) file rendered in Adobe PDF reader (V 9.1.2). > This is a limitation in the ArtWorks PDF importer - it renders > linear and radial fills from some applications but not from > others. Those from Xara are fine because I used files exported > from Xara Xtreme for testing, but I do not have Illustrator. Nor do I but there are many fantastic Illustrator tutorials that can be converted for AW users. There are times when it would be useful to display ai files via PDF in AW. > Unfortunately, Illustrator uses a different method, which my > importer does not support, so graduated fills from Illustrator do > not work yet. I will fix that when I find the time. Excellent. > Then, we > should be able to import that file perfectly into ArtWorks, at > much better quality than what you get from !PDF. That would be great Martin. Good luck. Richard ------------------------------------------------------------ To change, suspend or cancel your subscription go to //www.freelists.org/list/artworks ------------------------------------------------------------