Re: [ARMini-support] ARMini vs Iyonix
- From: Nick Roberts <tigger@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- To: armini-support@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Date: Mon, 11 Jun 2012 18:30:37 +0100
In message <13f1149e52.chris@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Chris Hall <chris@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> In message <b79aa59d52.tigger@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> Nick Roberts <tigger@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> >> http://www.riscosopen.org/forum/forums/5/topics/466?page=5
>
> > According to the benchmarks in this the table, we have:
>
> > ARMini (1000MHz) Iyonix (600MHz)
> > Draw Path 329% 90%
> > Draw Fill 364% 66%
>
> > where the reference is a StrongARM RiscPC. I'm not sure why the
> > Iyonix is so slow compared to a StrongARM, but apart from that the
> > figures would indicate that an ARMini should be 3-5 times faster
> > than an Iyonix, not 1/3rd as fast, which is what my test shows (all
> > the objects in the test document are paths, filled paths, or text
> > (which are in practice more filled paths).
> I have just repeated the tests and the results are still the same. I
> don't know why either. However a single test will not tell you how
> fast 'overall' another computer is. Only for tasks dominated by the
> particular test.
Indeed, I wasn't claiming that my test was indicative of the overall
difference in performance between an ARMini and an Iyonix. It's simply
that I was intending to redo the map from scratch using a Robinson
projection, and was hoping that the ARMini would make it easier.
Unfortunately, it won't.
--
Nick Roberts tigger @ orpheusinternet.co.uk
Hanlon's Razor: Never attribute to malice that which
can be adequately explained by stupidity.
---
To alter your preferences or leave the group,
visit //www.freelists.org/list/armini-support
List-related queries to info@xxxxxxxxxxxx
Other related posts:
