[argyllcms] Re: profiling camera

  • From: Graeme Gill <graeme@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
  • To: argyllcms@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
  • Date: Fri, 05 Aug 2011 09:39:39 +1000

nino loss wrote:

This worked fine, only I see that the peak error is 102.779001 and the average error is 37.968202

The most likely explanation is that the patch locations haven't
been recognised. You should follow the recommendations in
the documentation and check the diagnostic output of
scanin -dipn before proceeding to run colprof.

Graeme Gill.

Other related posts: