[argyllcms] Re: potential dispcal bug and question
- From: Florian Höch <lists+argyllcms@xxxxxxxxx>
- To: argyllcms@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Date: Sun, 10 Aug 2008 20:16:03 +0200
Graeme Gill schrieb:
Sounds a lot like a bug that was already reported. I would guess
that the fix for that bug in 1.0.2 will also fix it.
Ok, that sounds good! I already tried the V1.0.1_patches.txt, but it
didn't help (but it fixed another bug with dispread, which was
segfaulting under OS X / PPC otherwise).
It may work, I haven't tried it. The extra information is to support the
-u option, and isn't used to create the actual calibration curve.
Thanks for the clarification. I have a small request/suggestion. Could
the extra information be included in the .ti3 and thus the resulting
profile, in a future version of Argyll (and maybe also additional fields
in the .cal file for the -a, -b and -B options)? The point of my
suggestion being, that one could use a .cal file as "template" for the
options provided to dispcal (I am already using the available fields
from .cal files in my GUI to set some of the options).
(btw, I hope you had a pleasant vacation :))
Regards,
Florian Höch
Other related posts:
