[argyllcms] Re: i1 Display bundled with Samsung XL20

  • From: Florian Höch <lists+argyllcms@xxxxxxxxx>
  • To: argyllcms@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
  • Date: Thu, 15 Jan 2009 10:50:16 +0100

Another one:

LCD/user cal[0] = 0.076207
LCD/user cal[1] = -0.000237
LCD/user cal[2] = 0.024129
LCD/user cal[3] = -0.002681
LCD/user cal[4] = 0.061943
LCD/user cal[5] = 0.001686
LCD/user cal[6] = -0.000000
LCD/user cal[7] = 0.000315
LCD/user cal[8] = 0.157979

CRT/factory cal[0] = 0.074689
CRT/factory cal[1] = -0.000503
CRT/factory cal[2] = 0.023231
CRT/factory cal[3] = -0.001055
CRT/factory cal[4] = 0.058142
CRT/factory cal[5] = 0.001506
CRT/factory cal[6] = -0.001785
CRT/factory cal[7] = 0.002167
CRT/factory cal[8] = 0.154955

Regards,

Florian Höch


Since the rationale for the matrices is the individual calibration of
each instrument, I guess that comparing just the matrixes from just two
instruments may not necessarily be too meaningful. I could also imagine
that a particular relation of some sort between the LCD and the CRT
matrix (for instance inv(CRT_matrix)*LCD_matrix ?) may be more invariant
between different instruments than the calibration matrices themselves.

To get a feeling for the typical dispersion between different
instruments, it would be great if some other owners of an i1 Display
could  kindly post their matrices as well.

Thanks,
Gerhard

Other related posts:

  1. Home
  2. argyllcms
  3. Archive
  4. 01-2009