Oh, I'll be glad to help with documentation. If it works. This monkey only trusts his own lying eyes. I've been waiting for years for something like this, because otherwise I have to do it by hand like every other art printer. So I was very enthusiastic when Klaus first launched his tool. Note that adaptive gamut mapping is not something you want to over-use if you are in prepress: Images in a batch containing the same colors eg. various shots of the same model in the same dress, or scarves from a collection silk-printed with the same dyes, need to match on the printed page. Edmund On Fri, Jul 24, 2009 at 9:07 AM, Klaus Karcher<lists@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > edmund ronald wrote: >> >> I don' know if this is relevant here, but I'm highly sceptical of >> using Argyll to achieve adaptive gamut compression. When I tried that, >> prints got worse rather than better. Of course I'm not very >> knowledgable about this computer stuff although I trust my eyes - but >> maybe my friend Klaus has an opinion? > > ... well -- gamut compression is always a dirty business ;-) > > joking aside: While the adaptive gamut mapping approach of ArgyllCMS is dead > right IMHO, there were definitely issues in argyll 1.0.3 (GaMapICC 0.1), > frequently noticeable in saturated reds. > > While Graeme seeks for flaws in the gamut mapping /algorithms/ (If I got his > last post right), I spent quite some time in optimizing the gamut mapping > /parameters/ (file gammap.c of the V1.1.0_Beta snapshot) ... and at least > /I/ am quite satisfied with the result ;-) -- see my updated page > <http://digitalproof.info/gamapicc/examples.html> > > If you like to test GaMapICC in its current state, you can download it from > <http://digitalproof.info/gamapicc/GaMapICC0.3b.zip>. > > Please note that this is no complete release yet: it's Intel-only and > contains only the essential files (no growl, no source code, no > documentation). See also <http://digitalproof.info/gamapicc/> and feel free > to contact me if there are any further questions. > > Klaus >