> Graeme Gill wrote: > In what sense ? They make a mistake in saying that 3D LUTs cannot be > inverted exactly, but perhaps they mean that such an inversion cannot > be done quickly and exactly, which is true. > > Graeme Gill. well you can't do a 3x3 matrix with three 1D LUTs, can you ? you need a 3D LUT altogether ?! or maybe it was implied... -Maxime > >> "Use the ICC Curve-and-Matrix model: >> >> Film density -> Three 1-D LUTs -> 3x3 Matrix -> Scene XYZ >> >> This Curve-and-Matrix model can be inverted exactly for converting Scene XYZ >> to Film density >> >> NOTE: 3D LUTs cannot be inverted exactly" >> >> so they made a mistake I guess ?! _________________________________________________________________ Connect to the next generation of MSN Messenger http://imagine-msn.com/messenger/launch80/default.aspx?locale=en-us&source=wlmailtagline