[argyllcms] Re: colprof quality

  • From: Florian Höch <lists+argyllcms@xxxxxxxxx>
  • To: argyllcms@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
  • Date: Tue, 4 Feb 2020 16:55:26 +0100

Hi Roger,

Am 03.02.2020 um 16:39 schrieb graxx@xxxxxxxxxxxx:

I was comparing my monitor profile to another monitor profile, also created
using Argyll/dispCal and I was "shocked" to see the difference in the number
of grid points between the two profiles, see here:

https://1drv.ms/u/s!AkD78CVR1NBqkt5nOJGaWaJ5a2eWbg?e=gfeHsF

It would seem to be that 33 grid points is an overkill for a well-behaved
monitor profile, especially one with internal 14-bit LUTs?
Number of cLUT grid points in resulting profiles created by Argyll and DisplayCAL are dependent on the profile "quality" parameter (lower quality = less detail = fewer curve and cLUT grid points).

Florian.

Other related posts:

  1. Home
  2. argyllcms
  3. Archive
  4. 02-2020