[argyllcms] Re: Wrong gamma reading with Spyder 3.
- From: Darzur <zurdar@xxxxxxxxx>
- To: argyllcms@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Date: Fri, 05 Nov 2010 21:09:07 +0100
On Fri, 05 Nov 2010 20:36:53 +0100, Florian Höch
<lists+argyllcms@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>Meaning more colorization, lighter, darker...?
It's considerably darker so more colorization is visible on test
patterns. LUTs are affected more than with -G.
>Hmm, I don't imagine a ccmx file created in such a way will yield good
>results.
Yes, I know. But I didn't borrow spectro yet, and such correction look
better than nothing.
>It shouldn't affect the gamma afaik.
>Sure, but as the whitepoint as well as the calibration graybalance is a
>mixture of the primaries, it can be affected by the correction matrix
>(ie. it could affect the colorization you mentioned).
It shouldn't as colorization on those pathes depends on gamma only.
But it looks like I have to wait for some spectro. Then I'll know if
my Spyder is wrong.
>Old Argyll releases are still downloadable if you know the version, eg.
>http://www.argyllcms.com/Argyll_V1.3.0_linux_x86_bin.tgz
>http://www.argyllcms.com/Argyll_V1.3.0_osx10.3_ppc_bin.tgz
>http://www.argyllcms.com/Argyll_V1.3.0_win32_exe.zip
Thanks. :)
--
best regards,
darzur
Other related posts:
