[argyllcms] Re: "Wrong" ambient light reading with colormunki

  • From: adam k <aak1946@xxxxxxxxx>
  • To: "argyllcms@xxxxxxxxxxxxx" <argyllcms@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
  • Date: Sat, 15 May 2010 16:44:40 -0400

So far the best profile I got from iColor with dtp94.
Also, I'm happy with printer profiles made with CM.
Monitor is still not so good. Will play with it later.

Sent from iPhone

On May 15, 2010, at 4:34 PM, "Florian Höch" <lists
+argyllcms@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:

> That sentence doesn't seem to make sense :) I think you meant
> dispcalGUI? Look under the measurement mode combobox, it should show
> several modes for the ColorMunki (normal, adaptive, hires, hires
> +adaptive. -V would be adaptive).
> Am 11.05.2010 04:08, schrieb adam k:
>> I'm not that keen with Argyll command line mode. I plan to use it via
>> dispcal. So can you translate -V for me?
>> Thank you!
>> Sent from iPhone
>> On May 10, 2010, at 9:58 PM, Graeme Gill<graeme@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
>> wrote:
>>> adam k wrote:
>>>> It's a bummer, because I just ordered CM today hoping to get better
>>>> monitor
>>>> profile than with dtp94. I wish I knew it before I bought it.
>>> If you use the -V mode you will get more consistent readings of
>>> lower
>>> light levels using the Munki, as this will use longer integration
>>> times.
>>> Graeme Gill.
> --
> Florian Höch
> http://hoech.net

Other related posts: