[argyllcms] Re: Wow.
- From: Ben Goren <ben@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- To: argyllcms@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Date: Thu, 11 May 2006 16:21:43 -0700
On 2006 May 4, at 7:32 PM, Graeme Gill wrote:
> Ben Goren wrote:
>
>> I just made my first print with a no-holds-barred Argyll
>> profile (3680 patches pre-conditioned from an earlier profile,
>> ultra quality). It was a test sheet I've just finished making
>> with a few of my own favorite photos and some chart-type
>> things.
>
> Good to hear you got a great result. I'm not sure there's
> any reason to use -qu ("Ultra") though. -qm or -qh are
> perfectly reasonable settings. The only reason -qu exists, is to
> prove that it's not needed! [Perhaps I need to rename these
> options. "Quality" is a bit misleading. It's more to do with
> resolution of the interpolation grid, hence processing time, and
> it may or may not translate to better quality of result.]
Um...gee, thanks. /Now/ you tell me!
How 'bout renaming it to ``Useless Overkill''? That way, the flag
can stay the same but poor schmucks like me will get the point....
Cheers,
b&
Other related posts:
