Am 28.05.12 02:08 schrieb "Graeme Gill" unter <graeme@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>: >You're misunderstand me - I meant constrain the gamut given to >the gamut mapping, not constrain the images gamut. They are not >necessarily the same thing :- in typical ICC workflows the source >gamut is taken to be that of the colorspace. When the colorspace >is very wide gamut, that is an issue. Thank your for the reply. I've tried different colorspaces i.e. AdobeRGB.icc, eci.RGB_v2.icc, Lstar.icc, sRGB.icc (for example: collink -qu -ke -cmt -dpp -G image_ProPhotoRGB.gam sRGB.icc ISOcoated_v2.icc DLgam_sRGB-ISOcoated_v2.icc) - is that the way you mean? Depending on the input colorspace for the DL I get more or less saturated results after I've converted the image which has given the image_ProPhotoRGB.gam (cctiff -e ISOcoated_v2.icc DLgam_sRGB-ISOcoated_v2.icc DLedit_image_ProPhotoRGB.tif). I hope that I'm not completely wrong with this way. Thank your for your patience Michael Schulz