Nikolay Pokhilchenko wrote:
I was unable to do any realistic printer profile by scanner reading with LUT-based scanner profile. The better (but not good) results I've got only with XYZ matrix&gamma scanner profile.
It might depend on the scanner calibration chart. The best results I got with using a scanner as an instrument substitute was to create a custom scanner chart using the printer of 400 - 1000 points, measure it with an instrument, and then create a cLUT base scanner profile. This would only be of practical use of course, if one has access to an instrument to create the scanner test chart. Graeme Gill.