I'm still struggling with the calibration of my Lacie 324. I'm trying the two
way, its software (Blue Eye Pro PE) that seems support the white point level
and chromaticity setting via DDC, and Argyll that is more complete. One problem
is that the two software seem to read the same patches differently, some
patches are reported with very different distance from the target (like green 0
255 0, delta E 1.7 VS 14.78) and even the CCT of the final white point is
250/300K distant.
Below I attach the two reports, in the Lacie software I replace the original
RGB patches with the verify_extended.ti1 target ones.
Thank you for any consideration
Marco
