And yes, may be it looks correct for you. It's your choice... until you want to write a review about a display... May be you will publish erroneous measures and you will judge the test specimen based on your erroneous measures. So, I feel it is very dangerous! (If you care about the quality of your reviews and your integrity, I would suggest you to check your results with a spectrophotometer before you would publish that review. Or at least make a note about this possible issue.)
Thanks Janos for your important note.I bought the Spyder3Pro because Datacolor says it's compatible with wide gamut displays. I repeat, I'm not sure if
I profiled with in-bundle software and I expect results are correct, I guess inside obvious limits of a cheap colorimeter. Argyll results are similar, better looking to the numbers.
I'm an amateur and not a pro, I don't have any heavy color constrain, so I think this is acceptable.
The article could be affected by this issue, sure I write a note about it (thanks a lot!), but in any case I think could be a good starting point, even if you use a better colorimeter or a spectrophotometer.
I hope I will have the chance to test with another instrument. -- Andrea Olivotto http://www.andreaolivotto.com