Derin Korman wrote: Hi, > I was unclear on one thing, I build input profiles for a drum scanner using > argyll, and have generally found the shaper kind to work best overall. The > question is: Does it matter which type of rendering table I choose in > argyll as shaper profiles don't contain LUTs in the strict sense? Yes, matrix profiles are only colorimetric. I think it's a perfectly reasonable workflow to convert from an input device to a working space using perceptual, and do any editing or rendering to an output space from there. Graeme Gill.