[argyllcms] Re: Regarding building input profiles and conversion tables

  • From: Graeme Gill <graeme@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
  • To: argyllcms@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
  • Date: Wed, 24 Dec 2014 12:56:53 +1100

Derin Korman wrote:

> I was unclear on one thing, I build input profiles for a drum scanner using
> argyll, and have generally found the shaper kind to work best overall. The
> question is: Does it matter which type of rendering table I choose in
> argyll as shaper profiles don't contain LUTs in the strict sense?

Yes, matrix profiles are only colorimetric.

I think it's a perfectly reasonable workflow to convert from an
input device to a working space using perceptual, and do any
editing or rendering to an output space from there.

Graeme Gill.

Other related posts: