Vittorio Villani wrote:
Atkinos) have more patches than the one generated with Argyll. With Argyll I have 21 patches on each stripe, with other targets there are 36 patches in an equal-in-size stripe. So maybe what you could do is to give the possibility for the ColorMunki to have an "-h2" and for the i1Pro to have an -h parameter with more patches in each stripe.
You can push it harder yourself by setting the appropriate options (-a, -A, -m). I don't think it's wise to go below the manufacturers recommendations by default though.
2) The procedure to read the patches in "-i i1 mode" is very simple and reproducible: you just need to have a ruler.
But what do you line the ruler against ? How can you be sure that the instrument is actually centred over the strip within a fraction of a mm ?
What I would like to know is if you think that a more "full" test chart for the i1Pro could be possible.
It's all a trade-off between being generally usable, robust and accurate readings, vs. taking advantage of a specific set of conditions (type of printer, ie. screening resolution, print uniformity, accuracy of instrument guidance, printing margins). Graeme Gill.