On jeudi 27 décembre 2007, Guy K. Kloss wrote: > It could be easily used and integrated within Python applications. It > would be e. g. by far easier to build GUI applications. > > Of course, I can always go and call the application by submitting system > commands that will be executed. But it's a rather tedious and not so > nice way to do it. Black box wrapping is always a bit more dirty than a > proper API for a library ... I agree. As a python developper too, I owuld love to see a python binding. The API should provide functions that are used in command-line tools, to be able to build a GUI, and interacting with different returned values, and potential errors... Not all tools need to be re-designed through GUI. I think that profile, targen, and so, can be addressed through a system()-like (there are better way to do that in python). But dispcal, dispread... should be re-implemented in the GUI using the functions behind. -- Frédéric http://www.gbiloba.org