Chris Dennis wrote: > I last toyed with ArgyllCMS and the same colorimeter about three years > ago, and then I got some good results. For some reason I can't repeat > that. Could it be that the i1 is faulty, and doesn't detect green light > properly? It's been kept carefully in its box in the interim. Hi, sounds like a possibility. The cheaper colorimeters have a bit of a reputation for their filters changing over time (one of the reasons people still regard the DTP94 so well is that it has more stable glass filters). It's hard to be sure without comparing it to some other reference though. If I point my i1d2 with it's ambient cover at a bog standard incandescent frosted lamp (ie. color temperature notionally 2700K, although this will vary a bit with voltage), I get: spotread -a -x Result is XYZ: 206.573715 190.197995 53.835790, Yxy: 190.197995 0.458434 0.422092 Ambient = 597.5 Lux, CCT = 2808K (Delta E 12.827742) Suggested EV @ ISO100 for 597.5 Lux incident light = 7.9 Closest Planckian temperature = 2665K (Delta E 7.864903) Closest Daylight temperature = 2557K (Delta E 8.621692) which may indicate that my i1d2 is on the way out too, although it might give you something to benchmark your instrument against. (It may also just indicate how much the i1d2 is tuned for displays, rather than having good colorimetric shaped filters). If I use the i1d3 I get: Result is XYZ: 191.334483 171.589489 54.790203, Yxy: 171.589489 0.458051 0.410782 Ambient = 539.1 Lux, CCT = 2727K (Delta E 0.665665) Suggested EV @ ISO100 for 539.1 Lux incident light = 7.8 Closest Planckian temperature = 2720K (Delta E 0.400382) Closest Daylight temperature = 2618K (Delta E 0.487160) which is what you hope for (although it may also be an indication of how the i1d3 is somewhat more broadly accurate than the i1d2). Graeme Gill.