[argyllcms] Re: Perceptual intent

  • From: <robert@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
  • To: <argyllcms@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
  • Date: Tue, 16 Dec 2014 22:01:51 -0000

> For a profile like PSO Uncoated I see results that are along the lines of
>the OP's observations - so lacking in contrast that we could never send
>them to press.

Contrast certainly seems to be a problem in soft-proofs, but I will do some
prints and see if the contrast is poor in the prints as well (I should have
done this already ... I guess I'm trusting software a bit too much!).


Other related posts: