[argyllcms] Re: More questions about monitors
- From: Kai-Uwe Behrmann <ku.b@xxxxxx>
- To: argyllcms@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Date: Thu, 2 Apr 2009 20:31:08 +0200 (CEST)
Am 02.04.09, 19:20 +0200 schrieb Kai-Uwe Behrmann:
> Am 02.04.09, 19:03 +0200 schrieb Pascal de Bruijn:
> > I'm not loading the calibration, because it's way to bothersome. Having to
> > load
> > the calibration data everytime I'm going to use a color managed application.
> >
> > I'd rather let the application do all of the corrections. Even if it
> > might it's slightly
> > less accurate.
>
> The monitor calibration, especially the graphic card LUTs, does not
> or not much affect the output quality. Accessing the in monitor LUTs is
> currently out of scope for open source tools without signing a NDA. This
> could indeed bring a quality improvement.
I should add, LUTs make much sense in a monitor if its graininess is
smaller than that of the transport bus. So a 10/12/14 bit LUT in a monitor
compared to a todays typical 8-bit DVI data stream is an advantage.
Mit freundlichen Grüßen
Kai-Uwe Behrmann
--
Programmierung für Farbmanagement
www.behrmann.name + www.oyranos.org
Other related posts:
