[argyllcms] Re: Monitor hardware lut

  • From: Roger Breton <graxx@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
  • To: argyllcms@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
  • Date: Sat, 05 Sep 2015 09:14:03 -0400

NEC has always refused to let me have their SDK :(

/ Roger

-----Original Message-----
From: argyllcms-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:argyllcms-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx]
On Behalf Of Roger Breton
Sent: 5 septembre 2015 08:01
To: argyllcms@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: [argyllcms] Re: Monitor hardware lut

I'll second the NEC suggestion and be willing to contribute funds of my own.

/ Roger

-----Original Message-----
From: argyllcms-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:argyllcms-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx]
On Behalf Of Alan Goldhammer
Sent: 5 septembre 2015 07:40
To: argyllcms@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: [argyllcms] Re: Monitor hardware lut

I've been happy with NEC monitors and will contribute funds to purchase one
of those. I assume since their basic software Spectraview has not changed
over the years other than some minor fixes that the addressability across
the line of wide gamut "photo" monitors is the same. The price range is
also pretty reasonable depending on the size of the monitor. Since my
desktop is somewhat small, I find that I really do not need anything over 24
inches.

I'll kick in some funds to get this started.

Alan

-----Original Message-----
From: argyllcms-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:argyllcms-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx]
On Behalf Of Ben Goren
Sent: Friday, September 4, 2015 9:23 PM
To: argyllcms@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: [argyllcms] Re: Monitor hardware lut

On Sep 4, 2015, at 5:59 PM, Graeme Gill <graeme@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

Over the years I've offered more than once to add support for any
display
that someone is willing to send me.

Which displays would you most like to be sent? Or, perhaps less
impractically, which displays would you be most inclined to buy if enough
targeted donations could be rounded up?

b&




Other related posts:

  1. Home
  2. argyllcms
  3. Archive
  4. 09-2015