[argyllcms] Re: Monitor calibration
- From: Roger Breton <graxx@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
- To: argyllcms@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Date: Thu, 02 Feb 2012 19:35:34 -0500
My NEC PA271 is calibrated well under 100. There are no fixed, absolute
numbers to use.
Roger
-----Original Message-----
From: argyllcms-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:argyllcms-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx]
On Behalf Of adam k
Sent: February-02-12 6:43 PM
To: argyllcms@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: [argyllcms] Re: Monitor calibration
Well, thank you.
I'm concerned with editing photos mostly and want them to match prints.
Just wondering why everybody talks about calibrating to 120 cd/m^2. It looks
to bright for me.
A Kielcz
On Feb 2, 2012, at 6:35 PM, "János, Tóth F." <janos666@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> It does make sense for me as my plasma display can not reach more than
> ~85 cd/m^2 anyway. But this is enough in a dark room.
> 80 cd/m^2 is a little too bright for web pages with bright backgrounds
> and black text but usually optimal for most of the movies and games.
> In a dark room which is actually not that dark if you have white walls
> and there is something on a relatively big display...
>
Other related posts: