[argyllcms] Re: Limitations on Colormunki patch sizes?
- From: Ernst Dinkla <E.Dinkla@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- To: argyllcms@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Date: Tue, 12 Nov 2013 12:06:06 +0100
On 11/12/2013 07:57 AM, BC Rider wrote:
> BC Rider wrote:
If I'm going to make
a scanning apparatus I want to go as small as possible. What is the
minimum patch size that still retains full technical performance? 6mm
aperture size?
Once converted an old A3 HP pen plotter to carry a Spectrocam across
targets with an HPGL driver. It worked but an HP Z does it much better.
What is important is that the patch to sensor distance is like it should
be, any higher position of the ColorMunki and the readings can still be
accepted by the software but are not correct.The HP Z's take a longer
measurement time on dark/black patches, you might consider that or
adjust the dark patches that they are larger.
--
Met vriendelijke groet, Ernst Dinkla
http://www.pigment-print.com/spectralplots/spectrumviz_1.htm
December 2012: 500+ inkjet media paper white spectral plots.
Other related posts:
