Graeme,
Sorry for the long delay. I'd like to be able to "see" on my screen what
I would get if I printed the image using the device link profile
creation method you propose in the image dependent gamut mapping scenario.
If I can do that I would then for example, use the Luminance Preserving
Perceptualrendering intent if for nothing other then curiosity.
What would be the proper way to do something like that so I can see the
result without having to print them. I have a wide gamut display and I
use papers that have a gamut larger then Adobe RGB in some areas.
One last thing about this, the paper profiles where done using
I1Profiler and an I1 Pro II, do you thing I would get better results
staying all the way with Argyllcms profiles?
Maybe I should ask this differently, I could one evaluate or at least
compare the 2 process, the normal perceptual printing and image
dependent gamut mapping printing.
I do mostly flower photography and I almost always have a relatively
large part of my image gamut outside of the paper gamut for this reason
I keep my image in tiff 16 bit in ProPhoto and I print using the 16 bit
driver with a Canon Pro-1000 practically always using the perceptual
rendering intent. So I'm very interested to evaluate if there are any
tangible benefit in using the gamut mapping method systematically. Would
there be an acceptable way without having to print on expensive paper to
evaluate this?
Thanks,
Yves
On 2/14/2022 5:11 PM, Graeme Gill wrote:
Yves Gauvreau wrote:
Hi,
*I find this method (scenario doc) the way to go for my kind of work, and I’dI'm not sure what options you mean. Could you be more specific, i.e. examples ?
like to investigate
the various options I could use without having to print the files. Any
suggestions on how to proceed?*
Cheers,
Graeme Gill.
