I think it depends on your scan speed. I have an i1 Pro and can read four
sheets of patches (1848) in 10 minutes give or take. I do one full repeat
and use the Argyll command to average the two readings before doing the
profile generation. Once I get into the rhythm of doing the back and forth
scanning, I find that the number of misreading errors drops though I must
confess that I have never gone through a full patch set without one or two
misreads. I seldom see major outliers of any single patch set in looking at
an Excel spreadsheet of all the readings. Standard errors are consistently
low and the profiles are good for my use.
I have submitted a sheet of Moab Juniper Rag patches printed with an Argyll
profile to Aardenburg Imaging for light fast stability testing.
Alan
-----Original Message-----
From: argyllcms-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx <argyllcms-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> On
Behalf Of Yves Gauvreau
Sent: Monday, June 15, 2020 8:35 AM
To: argyllcms@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: [argyllcms] Re: I1Pro reading charts
Hi,
What I should have ask maybe, is: would you recommend reading targets a few
times? In theory it should improve accuracy, right? But is it really
necessary?
Would you recommend removing the outliers from the data set?
Any suggestions for the outlier threshold?
What would you recommend to avoid over fitting?
What would you recommend as a more real life test for a profile? I would
assume using patches not used before in the profile creation. How to
evaluate all this as objectively as possible?
All this for RGB printer only.
Thanks,
YG
