[argyllcms] Re: I have made a tranger icc for my paper
- From: ltkun <ltkun@xxxxxxx>
- To: argyllcms@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Date: Mon, 11 Apr 2011 15:07:50 +0800 (CST)
thanks Graeme Gill. You are right. I use 300dpi to scan a picture. I think it
will be more accurate.but scanin has some difficult to aotu recoganize the
chart. This time I use -dipn to make the charts be properly recognised . but
when I am at the colprof step I also get the Profile check complete, peak err =
84.302879, avg err = 23.234012, RMS = 26.345680. Also I have something wrong
that I can't realize.
At 2011-04-11 12:35:41，"Graeme Gill" <graeme@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>ltkun wrote:
>> I have just run the commands from the scenarios,how to avoid this?
>> I have just run :
>> 1. targen -v -d4 -l260 -f2028 PrinterB
>> 2.printtarg -v -s -iSS -pA4R PrinterB
>> 3.scanin -v -c PrinterB1.tif PrinterB1.cht scanner.icm PrinterB
>> scanin -v -ca PrinterB2.tif PrinterB2.cht scanner.icm PrinterB
>> 4.copy PrinterB.ti3 PrinterBt.ti3
>> 5.colprof -v -qm -b -cmt -dpp PrinterBt
>> all the commands are from examples.
>
>Hi,
> at the colprof step you get something like:
>
>Profile check complete, peak err = 91.558309, avg err = 25.405694, RMS =
>29.456946
>
>which (as is mentioned in the documentation) indicates something
>has gone badly wrong. Typically this might indicate that the device
>values are all jumbled up, or that the CIE values are completely
>bogus. Perhaps the scanner recognition has failed. Did you check
>the scanin diagnostic output, to check that the charts were properly
>recognised ? - e.g:
>
>scanin -v -dipn -c PrinterB1.tif PrinterB1.cht scanner.icm PrinterB diag1.tif
>scanin -v -dipn -ca PrinterB2.tif PrinterB2.cht scanner.icm PrinterB diag2.tif
>
>cheers,
> Graeme Gill.
>
Other related posts:
