[argyllcms] Re: How many patches?
- From: "Greg Sullivan" <greg.sullivan@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
- To: <argyllcms@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Tue, 26 Jul 2005 04:39:19 +1000
Roger,
Yes, rather than muck around slowly increasing the number of patches, I
decided to increase the number of patches significantly. And, assuming
that the 2200 is as at least about as non-linear as the 9600/7600,
from what Bill Atkinson says, 3000 is still nowhere near enough to really
do a good job with a convential profiler. :)
Now, you know what question I'm going to ask you - what driver (RIP?) did
you use which allowed you to profile in CMYK? (I assume you're bypassing
Epson pseudo-RGB driver, and have a driver which is directly controlling
the individual CcMmYKk inks?)
Greg.
-----Original Message-----
From: argyllcms-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:argyllcms-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx]
On Behalf Of Roger Breton
Sent: Tuesday, 26 July 2005 03:02
To: argyllcms@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: [argyllcms] Re: How many patches?
> Started on 836 patches, but saw a definite improvement when I
> went up to 3000.
>
> Greg.
Wow! From 836 to 2200. Huh.
I profiled a 2200 recently, in CMYK, not with argyll but I had to
extensively edit the grayscale to get good neutrals.
Regards,
Roger Breton | Laval, Canada | graxx@xxxxxxxxxxxx
http://pages.infinit.net/graxx
Other related posts:
