Good to know but there are other things that'll happen first. I'm imagining
ways I can approach that ideal without having that unique part. The worst case
workaround would take the form of tediously collecting multiple sets of
readings which I then average. I have more questions right now that start with
"Can I ...", than "What is a quicker way to ...".
At the moment I'm working with non-blatantly-directional paper surfaces. It
shouldn't take long to determine the magnitude of the issue with any one paper
since I have live readings of XYZ and Lab to monitor.
From: argyllcms-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx <argyllcms-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> on behalf
of Graeme Gill <graeme@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Sent: Tuesday, December 5, 2017 10:40 PM
Subject: [argyllcms] Re: Help me format a printer calibration .ti3 file?
TONY ARNERICH wrote:
results on a ColorChecker didn't change by more than 1 dE from the previous
housing, but the painting will happen anyway.