[argyllcms] Re: Gamut of output profiles
- From: Graeme Gill <graeme@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- To: argyllcms@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Date: Fri, 14 Sep 2007 09:57:40 +1000
Lars Tore Gustavsen wrote:
I have updated the wrl file now. Anyway profcheck is very interesting.
This is against the eye-one match made profile.
profcheck easyrgb12-argyll.ti3 easyrgb12.icc
Profile check complete, errors: max. = 12.543195, avg. = 6.023216, RMS
= 7.052291
and against the profile made with argyll
profcheck easyrgb12-argyll.ti3 easyrgb12-argyll.icc
Profile check complete, errors: max. = 5.446567, avg. = 1.637336, RMS = 2.100115
This would hint that the profile made with eye-one match
is somewhat less accurate (and its gamut therefore less reliable)
than the argyll profile, assuming of course, that profcheck is being
reasonable in its behaviour.
Since my English is limited I have uploaded the files here:
http://www.mulebakken.net/div/iccexamin.html
The iccexamin output doesn't seem correct - it seems to be still
having the problem with the 100/255 scaling of device values ?
Graeme Gill.
Other related posts:
